<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Heavenly Sword</title>
	<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 20:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-64600</link>
		<author>Eric</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 11:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-64600</guid>
		<description>I don't agree with the shortness and combat systems being all too flawed and the game offering no incentive to be re-played. Alot of games in the same genre (I'm looking at Devil May Cry and God of War here) are equally short BUT they hide this fact by artificially stretching it with silly jump 'n run and/or puzzle sequences and/or recycled areas and enemies etc. etc. etc.
You could say that Heavenly Sword is the first title in a long time which is HONEST about its length, and thusly not annoying, but your mileage may vary.
As for the aftertouch puzzles, you may call them an insult to your intelligence, but all they are doing is testing your skill with a new control.  I understand that many people may feel insulted in their gamer ego when they discover there's this new control scheme they're having trouble with, but there's something very entertaining about it.  And I was surprised, having to see that--after read so many times how the Aftertouch puzzles in Heavenly Sword were bashed--that there weren't more than 3-4 of them at all, and all of them were solved very easily.

As for the combat system and the incentive to be re-played, I also beg to differ.  As it stands, I find the combat system and appearance of the fights that result from it quite enjoyable.  You got lucky with button mashing?  Try Hell mode (which you should have unlocked if you beat the game), where you need to be expert in blocking and counter-attacking and get destroyed if you just mash buttons.  Overall, I think the game's exotic blocking system and the different stances offer something fresh for the hack 'n slash combat systems out there.  Heck, I enjoy even the cannon and sniper missions in this game *because* of the Aftertouch feature, so even if there's little in-game incentive to re-play sections per se, there's an awesome game that wants to be played, not just an awesome presentation.  It's just not everybody's cup of tea.  I'm just amused sometimes how many people seem to be copying their critique or bashing of this title from eachother.

What I would have given it -&#62; 8.5/10</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t agree with the shortness and combat systems being all too flawed and the game offering no incentive to be re-played. Alot of games in the same genre (I&#8217;m looking at Devil May Cry and God of War here) are equally short BUT they hide this fact by artificially stretching it with silly jump &#8216;n run and/or puzzle sequences and/or recycled areas and enemies etc. etc. etc.<br />
You could say that Heavenly Sword is the first title in a long time which is HONEST about its length, and thusly not annoying, but your mileage may vary.<br />
As for the aftertouch puzzles, you may call them an insult to your intelligence, but all they are doing is testing your skill with a new control.  I understand that many people may feel insulted in their gamer ego when they discover there&#8217;s this new control scheme they&#8217;re having trouble with, but there&#8217;s something very entertaining about it.  And I was surprised, having to see that&#8211;after read so many times how the Aftertouch puzzles in Heavenly Sword were bashed&#8211;that there weren&#8217;t more than 3-4 of them at all, and all of them were solved very easily.</p>
<p>As for the combat system and the incentive to be re-played, I also beg to differ.  As it stands, I find the combat system and appearance of the fights that result from it quite enjoyable.  You got lucky with button mashing?  Try Hell mode (which you should have unlocked if you beat the game), where you need to be expert in blocking and counter-attacking and get destroyed if you just mash buttons.  Overall, I think the game&#8217;s exotic blocking system and the different stances offer something fresh for the hack &#8216;n slash combat systems out there.  Heck, I enjoy even the cannon and sniper missions in this game *because* of the Aftertouch feature, so even if there&#8217;s little in-game incentive to re-play sections per se, there&#8217;s an awesome game that wants to be played, not just an awesome presentation.  It&#8217;s just not everybody&#8217;s cup of tea.  I&#8217;m just amused sometimes how many people seem to be copying their critique or bashing of this title from eachother.</p>
<p>What I would have given it -&gt; 8.5/10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-38362</link>
		<author>Me</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-38362</guid>
		<description>Oh and 360 games arn't scoring higher just some of them if u took all the exclusives on each console and averaged them out, ps3's would have a higher mean score.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and 360 games arn&#8217;t scoring higher just some of them if u took all the exclusives on each console and averaged them out, ps3&#8217;s would have a higher mean score.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-38349</link>
		<author>Me</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-38349</guid>
		<description>If u where button mashing on HS then it is unfair of u to criticise it has it is ur own laziness if u where button mashing, RFOM was never hyped as a "halo beater"(i hate that word, what's so good about Halo?" but RFOM was good for a launch title. Warhawk gave people choice, they didn't give a rubbish single player because they concentrated on multi=-player(like Halo 3) they just said this is for online multi, get it if u want. Moorstorm no style? have u played Forz aand PGR?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If u where button mashing on HS then it is unfair of u to criticise it has it is ur own laziness if u where button mashing, RFOM was never hyped as a &#8220;halo beater&#8221;(i hate that word, what&#8217;s so good about Halo?&#8221; but RFOM was good for a launch title. Warhawk gave people choice, they didn&#8217;t give a rubbish single player because they concentrated on multi=-player(like Halo 3) they just said this is for online multi, get it if u want. Moorstorm no style? have u played Forz aand PGR?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veritas</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-36257</link>
		<author>Veritas</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-36257</guid>
		<description>Why yes, yes I do!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why yes, yes I do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-36207</link>
		<author>Me</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 09:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-36207</guid>
		<description>That depends, do u hav COD4?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That depends, do u hav COD4?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veritas</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-36176</link>
		<author>Veritas</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-36176</guid>
		<description>Nope, never. You’re my new friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, never. You’re my new friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Glovner</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-36166</link>
		<author>The_Glovner</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-36166</guid>
		<description>Comes back down to opinion really. Heavenly sword = button bashing shite, Ratchet and Clank = Ain't played it but it is a platform game and i fucking hate platforms, Warhawk = Better than anything on 360? fucks sake please and some single player is nice to have, Motorstorm = Was good for half an hour before I realised it was all style over substance (a regular problem with Sony) and of course that famous Halo beater Resistance FOM = It was average.

But again if you compare average review scores,  the 360's games are scoring higher. End of.

So entitled to your opinion but it ain't reflected by the majority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comes back down to opinion really. Heavenly sword = button bashing shite, Ratchet and Clank = Ain&#8217;t played it but it is a platform game and i fucking hate platforms, Warhawk = Better than anything on 360? fucks sake please and some single player is nice to have, Motorstorm = Was good for half an hour before I realised it was all style over substance (a regular problem with Sony) and of course that famous Halo beater Resistance FOM = It was average.</p>
<p>But again if you compare average review scores,  the 360&#8217;s games are scoring higher. End of.</p>
<p>So entitled to your opinion but it ain&#8217;t reflected by the majority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-36135</link>
		<author>Me</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 09:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-36135</guid>
		<description>Don’t worry just ignore him and i think he’ll go away, probably doesn’t hav any friends</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don’t worry just ignore him and i think he’ll go away, probably doesn’t hav any friends</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veritas</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35948</link>
		<author>Veritas</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35948</guid>
		<description>More like Warshit, mirite?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More like Warshit, mirite?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35918</link>
		<author>Me</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35918</guid>
		<description>That depends, do u hav Warhawk?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That depends, do u hav Warhawk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35914</link>
		<author>Me</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35914</guid>
		<description>Mass Effect, GOW, Bioshock where great and i guess Halo 3 was good (online anyway), but the games on the 360 just don't appeal to me other "high scoring" games like Dead Rising, PGR and Forza i found boring. The top rated games on the PS3: Uncharted, Heavenly Sword, Ratchet and Clank: TOD, Warhawk(it really is better than anything on the 360 or Wii), Motorstorm and RFOM. Where all as good as anything on the 360 and where all different genres, the top rated games on the 360 where just shooters and racers(althougth the racers where very bland and boring), I mean really think hard and tell me what games beat the top PS3 games in their respective genres. Plus i can't see myself going back to the 360 as the only 2008 game that looks intrresting is Lost Odyssey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mass Effect, GOW, Bioshock where great and i guess Halo 3 was good (online anyway), but the games on the 360 just don&#8217;t appeal to me other &#8220;high scoring&#8221; games like Dead Rising, PGR and Forza i found boring. The top rated games on the PS3: Uncharted, Heavenly Sword, Ratchet and Clank: TOD, Warhawk(it really is better than anything on the 360 or Wii), Motorstorm and RFOM. Where all as good as anything on the 360 and where all different genres, the top rated games on the 360 where just shooters and racers(althougth the racers where very bland and boring), I mean really think hard and tell me what games beat the top PS3 games in their respective genres. Plus i can&#8217;t see myself going back to the 360 as the only 2008 game that looks intrresting is Lost Odyssey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veritas</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35910</link>
		<author>Veritas</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 06:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35910</guid>
		<description>Nope, never. You're my new friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, never. You&#8217;re my new friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Glovner</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35903</link>
		<author>The_Glovner</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35903</guid>
		<description>Well if you can't think of any 360 games that are better than that lot then you ain't looking very hard, but that is subjective anyway, comes down to opinion.

The only way to really settle an arguement like that is by looking at the average reviews of the games and if you take the time to look you will see a lot more 360 games witht higher scores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if you can&#8217;t think of any 360 games that are better than that lot then you ain&#8217;t looking very hard, but that is subjective anyway, comes down to opinion.</p>
<p>The only way to really settle an arguement like that is by looking at the average reviews of the games and if you take the time to look you will see a lot more 360 games witht higher scores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35871</link>
		<author>Me</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35871</guid>
		<description>Yeah i mean good quality variety, i prefer MS and GT to PGR and Forza, i can't think of a 360 game that is as good as Ratchet and Clank Uncharted, Heavenly Sword or Warhawk in there respective genre's only the 360 has better FPS but the only ones i really like r Bioshock and GOW and the ps3 has RFOM with UT3, Haze and Killzone 2 cominging out . I would only be getting the Wii to play multiplayer games (can't wait for Smash Bros. Brawl) and Galaxy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah i mean good quality variety, i prefer MS and GT to PGR and Forza, i can&#8217;t think of a 360 game that is as good as Ratchet and Clank Uncharted, Heavenly Sword or Warhawk in there respective genre&#8217;s only the 360 has better FPS but the only ones i really like r Bioshock and GOW and the ps3 has RFOM with UT3, Haze and Killzone 2 cominging out . I would only be getting the Wii to play multiplayer games (can&#8217;t wait for Smash Bros. Brawl) and Galaxy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Glovner</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35870</link>
		<author>The_Glovner</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35870</guid>
		<description>On the subject of you buying a Wii though I would recommened it, but only as a second system, due to the fact that it really does lack variety of games at the moment. There are a few great ones, but many with the motion sensing tacked on as a half arsed after thought.

But then again since variety seems to be a big selling point for you maybe the Wii isn't the best console, since you will be leaving yourself with the two consoles (which in my and most of the rest of the gaming worlds opinion) have the lesser amount of variety available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the subject of you buying a Wii though I would recommened it, but only as a second system, due to the fact that it really does lack variety of games at the moment. There are a few great ones, but many with the motion sensing tacked on as a half arsed after thought.</p>
<p>But then again since variety seems to be a big selling point for you maybe the Wii isn&#8217;t the best console, since you will be leaving yourself with the two consoles (which in my and most of the rest of the gaming worlds opinion) have the lesser amount of variety available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35869</link>
		<author>Me</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35869</guid>
		<description>please, just read my post and ur post's again, u're making urself sound like an idiot, great quality games: Warhawk, Heavenly Sword, Uncharted, Ratchet and Clank, RFOM, Motorstorm. Nice variety if genres? don't u think. 
360 lack of vaiety: FPS or poor racing games, and u pratically have to be forced to play online to get any enjoyment from a game that isn't Bioshock or Mass Effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please, just read my post and ur post&#8217;s again, u&#8217;re making urself sound like an idiot, great quality games: Warhawk, Heavenly Sword, Uncharted, Ratchet and Clank, RFOM, Motorstorm. Nice variety if genres? don&#8217;t u think.<br />
360 lack of vaiety: FPS or poor racing games, and u pratically have to be forced to play online to get any enjoyment from a game that isn&#8217;t Bioshock or Mass Effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Glovner</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35868</link>
		<author>The_Glovner</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35868</guid>
		<description>LOL, yeah right, keep backtracking.

Don't take that tone with you? I wouldn't have if you hadn't posted in the manner you did, what goes around comes around.

I don't know your opinions? Well I know about the ones you put in your post which are the ones that I answered, so I think thats fair, if you don't well that would be you opinion.

Didn't shout once, and swearing is a natural feature of the way we talk round these parts so nothing meant by it, just a way of making the statement a little more colourful.

And with your last paragraph I start to doubt the authenticity of your statement.

Lack of variety on the 360? Great quality games out on the PS3?

Aye ok then, have a fight with yourself cos like the usual fanboy's (yes i think you are) your points are full of shit and you can't see the wood for the trees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, yeah right, keep backtracking.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t take that tone with you? I wouldn&#8217;t have if you hadn&#8217;t posted in the manner you did, what goes around comes around.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know your opinions? Well I know about the ones you put in your post which are the ones that I answered, so I think thats fair, if you don&#8217;t well that would be you opinion.</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t shout once, and swearing is a natural feature of the way we talk round these parts so nothing meant by it, just a way of making the statement a little more colourful.</p>
<p>And with your last paragraph I start to doubt the authenticity of your statement.</p>
<p>Lack of variety on the 360? Great quality games out on the PS3?</p>
<p>Aye ok then, have a fight with yourself cos like the usual fanboy&#8217;s (yes i think you are) your points are full of shit and you can&#8217;t see the wood for the trees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35865</link>
		<author>Me</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35865</guid>
		<description>Wow, u hav rage problems, please don't take that tone with me again. u where using opinions "overpriced", "no games". u said before u don't own a ps3 so y should u complain if u havn't experienced it fully. U definatly r biased as u assumed i'm some ps3 fanboy, go on read my post again and tell me if it sounds fanboyish or if "picking a fight", u don't even know my opinions, u r the one picking a fight, like a typical fanboy, i criticized some points of ur post and u come back swearing, shouting ur opinions about how ps3 is rubbish.
I have a 360, i like it especially bioshock, but there is not enougth variety on the console so i rarely play it anymore and no use my ps3 alot more with all the recent great quality games out. I'm also thinkin bout selling my 360 and getting a Wii.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, u hav rage problems, please don&#8217;t take that tone with me again. u where using opinions &#8220;overpriced&#8221;, &#8220;no games&#8221;. u said before u don&#8217;t own a ps3 so y should u complain if u havn&#8217;t experienced it fully. U definatly r biased as u assumed i&#8217;m some ps3 fanboy, go on read my post again and tell me if it sounds fanboyish or if &#8220;picking a fight&#8221;, u don&#8217;t even know my opinions, u r the one picking a fight, like a typical fanboy, i criticized some points of ur post and u come back swearing, shouting ur opinions about how ps3 is rubbish.<br />
I have a 360, i like it especially bioshock, but there is not enougth variety on the console so i rarely play it anymore and no use my ps3 alot more with all the recent great quality games out. I&#8217;m also thinkin bout selling my 360 and getting a Wii.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Glovner</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35859</link>
		<author>The_Glovner</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35859</guid>
		<description>Also at what point does my post display biase against Sony?

I think what I do is point out two of the "facts" that are used by the Sony Fanboy brigade with regularity and put the "fact" into a more realistic perspective than the usual half information version that gets touted.

I was complaining about Sony fanboys because thats what the conversation was on (you me see I made a mention towards Nintendic aswell), however I pretty much deplore any fanboy actions (360 inculded), but as the conversation was not on 360 I felt no need to mention it.

So tell me, who looks stupid now fuck nuts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also at what point does my post display biase against Sony?</p>
<p>I think what I do is point out two of the &#8220;facts&#8221; that are used by the Sony Fanboy brigade with regularity and put the &#8220;fact&#8221; into a more realistic perspective than the usual half information version that gets touted.</p>
<p>I was complaining about Sony fanboys because thats what the conversation was on (you me see I made a mention towards Nintendic aswell), however I pretty much deplore any fanboy actions (360 inculded), but as the conversation was not on 360 I felt no need to mention it.</p>
<p>So tell me, who looks stupid now fuck nuts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Glovner</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35858</link>
		<author>The_Glovner</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35858</guid>
		<description>No you are just reading my post incorrectly and flying off on one (which just confirms the points I am making, how dare I say anything against Sony eh?).

By "the sony spin I see here" I mean from the fucktards like you trying to pick a fight anytime anyone has a different opinion about your amazing (overpriced, no games) system.

Sit back down and shut the fuck up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No you are just reading my post incorrectly and flying off on one (which just confirms the points I am making, how dare I say anything against Sony eh?).</p>
<p>By &#8220;the sony spin I see here&#8221; I mean from the fucktards like you trying to pick a fight anytime anyone has a different opinion about your amazing (overpriced, no games) system.</p>
<p>Sit back down and shut the fuck up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35851</link>
		<author>Me</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35851</guid>
		<description>"sony spin u see here" r u actually suggesting that sony write these articles, that sounds kinda stupid. Ur also complaining about sony fanboys when 360 fanboys r just as bad. For someone claiming to be not biased against sony, u sure do sound like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;sony spin u see here&#8221; r u actually suggesting that sony write these articles, that sounds kinda stupid. Ur also complaining about sony fanboys when 360 fanboys r just as bad. For someone claiming to be not biased against sony, u sure do sound like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Glovner</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35847</link>
		<author>The_Glovner</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35847</guid>
		<description>Sorry for taking so long to reply to this. Taking a break from commenting since shit was just getting ridiculous.

Personally I don't think what I am doing is trolling. I am a gamer, not a fanboy. So I come to playstatic to read what has been going on in the world of PS3 (don't forget, I did have a PS, still have a PS2 and a PSP so don't really think it's fair to say I have any biase against Sony). After I read the article if I feel I need to comment on something I will. However I will always try to do it in a balanced way (but still from my point of view as I am not really in a position to answer it from anyone elses). If I have given criticism in the past (even when replying to Augustus, an example can be seen from the time I took to intelligently lay down eveything for him not to even bother reading it and dismissing everything there without actually having any knowledge about what was contained).

I go on to Nintendic too, however over there don't really feel the need to reply as much as the points people make are not laced with anything like the Sony spin you see in here.

So all I am doing is pulling people up for misleading facts and offering an alternative opinion for their interpretation of the facts.

Things like "Sony sales up 175% in UK", quickly turns into comment after comment about how the PS3 shits on 360. That annoys me, it's careful use of the facts, 175% increase of very fucking little to start with isn't really that great a thing.

"PS3 uses Blu-Ray discs allowing more information to be stored to make for greater games, R:FoM, that used so much disc space that it couldn't ever hope get on a DVD-9 for the 360", okay then. But should we bother looking at this a little closer then and point out that to reduce loading times on the Blu-Ray, they added the same code numerous times for each individual level so filling up disc space that they didn't have to if they were using more advanced compression methods and better programming architecture.

So thats my viewpoint and if you think thats trolling well fair enough, but compare my responses to the quality of the statements I get in return and it might put it into perspective on who is actually responsible for the trolling. (Looking at you Bot)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for taking so long to reply to this. Taking a break from commenting since shit was just getting ridiculous.</p>
<p>Personally I don&#8217;t think what I am doing is trolling. I am a gamer, not a fanboy. So I come to playstatic to read what has been going on in the world of PS3 (don&#8217;t forget, I did have a PS, still have a PS2 and a PSP so don&#8217;t really think it&#8217;s fair to say I have any biase against Sony). After I read the article if I feel I need to comment on something I will. However I will always try to do it in a balanced way (but still from my point of view as I am not really in a position to answer it from anyone elses). If I have given criticism in the past (even when replying to Augustus, an example can be seen from the time I took to intelligently lay down eveything for him not to even bother reading it and dismissing everything there without actually having any knowledge about what was contained).</p>
<p>I go on to Nintendic too, however over there don&#8217;t really feel the need to reply as much as the points people make are not laced with anything like the Sony spin you see in here.</p>
<p>So all I am doing is pulling people up for misleading facts and offering an alternative opinion for their interpretation of the facts.</p>
<p>Things like &#8220;Sony sales up 175% in UK&#8221;, quickly turns into comment after comment about how the PS3 shits on 360. That annoys me, it&#8217;s careful use of the facts, 175% increase of very fucking little to start with isn&#8217;t really that great a thing.</p>
<p>&#8220;PS3 uses Blu-Ray discs allowing more information to be stored to make for greater games, R:FoM, that used so much disc space that it couldn&#8217;t ever hope get on a DVD-9 for the 360&#8243;, okay then. But should we bother looking at this a little closer then and point out that to reduce loading times on the Blu-Ray, they added the same code numerous times for each individual level so filling up disc space that they didn&#8217;t have to if they were using more advanced compression methods and better programming architecture.</p>
<p>So thats my viewpoint and if you think thats trolling well fair enough, but compare my responses to the quality of the statements I get in return and it might put it into perspective on who is actually responsible for the trolling. (Looking at you Bot)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35842</link>
		<author>Me</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35842</guid>
		<description>Don't worry just ignore him and i think he'll go away, probably doesn't hav any friends</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry just ignore him and i think he&#8217;ll go away, probably doesn&#8217;t hav any friends</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veritas</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35816</link>
		<author>Veritas</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 22:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-35816</guid>
		<description>More like Heavenly Shit, mirite?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More like Heavenly Shit, mirite?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AN angry H0BO</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-34566</link>
		<author>AN angry H0BO</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-34566</guid>
		<description>Legacy of Kain, owns all these games.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legacy of Kain, owns all these games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-34231</link>
		<author>Mike</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 12:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-34231</guid>
		<description>Finally someone who understands that in Heavenly Sword u hav to put some effort in to get the most out of it. People can't complain that it's a butter masher, if u are buttonmashing then you're just being lazy and doing it out of choice. I really enjoyed HS after I put some effort in and lerned the combo's. I soon come to realise it has the best swordplay since the excellent LOTR:ROTK game, GOW is great as well but it's sword combat is different as it rely's on attack whilst HS rely's on defence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally someone who understands that in Heavenly Sword u hav to put some effort in to get the most out of it. People can&#8217;t complain that it&#8217;s a butter masher, if u are buttonmashing then you&#8217;re just being lazy and doing it out of choice. I really enjoyed HS after I put some effort in and lerned the combo&#8217;s. I soon come to realise it has the best swordplay since the excellent LOTR:ROTK game, GOW is great as well but it&#8217;s sword combat is different as it rely&#8217;s on attack whilst HS rely&#8217;s on defence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seraph</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-34226</link>
		<author>Seraph</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 10:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-34226</guid>
		<description>yeah so i guess i'm late on this.  i agree completely with one blogger here.  none and i mean none of the reviewers comment about the combo and counter combat system.  and i think most of you guys... by what you have written just didnt get the game...  the combo/counter system is pretty damn amazing.  the whole point of the game is style without getting hit.  this is definitely not a button masher.  i think you guys should have another go at this title and give it the attention it deserves.  

8.5 / 10  game needed some length.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah so i guess i&#8217;m late on this.  i agree completely with one blogger here.  none and i mean none of the reviewers comment about the combo and counter combat system.  and i think most of you guys&#8230; by what you have written just didnt get the game&#8230;  the combo/counter system is pretty damn amazing.  the whole point of the game is style without getting hit.  this is definitely not a button masher.  i think you guys should have another go at this title and give it the attention it deserves.  </p>
<p>8.5 / 10  game needed some length.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lone goat</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-34067</link>
		<author>lone goat</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 21:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-34067</guid>
		<description>"Nowt but fucking kids."

^^Like that guy^^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Nowt but fucking kids.&#8221;</p>
<p>^^Like that guy^^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AN angry H0BO</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-33723</link>
		<author>AN angry H0BO</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-33723</guid>
		<description>-I think all the glovner is doing is giving augustusbot a taste of his own medicine.  Believe me man, there are more trolls in the xbox site then this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-I think all the glovner is doing is giving augustusbot a taste of his own medicine.  Believe me man, there are more trolls in the xbox site then this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sage</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-33605</link>
		<author>Sage</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-33605</guid>
		<description>But I mean Glovner only has negative things to say about the PS3 and he is making comments on most of these PS3 related articles. My point is why is he always here(PS3 side) when he has nothing positive to say? Is that not trolling?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I mean Glovner only has negative things to say about the PS3 and he is making comments on most of these PS3 related articles. My point is why is he always here(PS3 side) when he has nothing positive to say? Is that not trolling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AN angry H0BO</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-33599</link>
		<author>AN angry H0BO</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-33599</guid>
		<description>-dude augustusbot has proven himself to be the biggest troll on all the IC sites, take what he says with a giant grain of salt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-dude augustusbot has proven himself to be the biggest troll on all the IC sites, take what he says with a giant grain of salt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sage</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-33047</link>
		<author>Sage</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-33047</guid>
		<description>Augustus brought up a solid point. Why are you here Glov? I mean I have nothing against you but you seem to only have negative things to say about the PS3, and that is trolling in a way. Unless you do own a PS3 but I seriously doubt that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Augustus brought up a solid point. Why are you here Glov? I mean I have nothing against you but you seem to only have negative things to say about the PS3, and that is trolling in a way. Unless you do own a PS3 but I seriously doubt that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: augustusbot</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-32992</link>
		<author>augustusbot</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 05:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-32992</guid>
		<description>i dont even read what you type anymore.  you annoy me.  the only posts by you i read and enjoy are the ones that you don't write.  you know the ones...  "i'm a big gay", that sorta thing.

go play your crappy xbla games and quit trolling ps3 forums w/ your 'factual' gibberish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont even read what you type anymore.  you annoy me.  the only posts by you i read and enjoy are the ones that you don&#8217;t write.  you know the ones&#8230;  &#8220;i&#8217;m a big gay&#8221;, that sorta thing.</p>
<p>go play your crappy xbla games and quit trolling ps3 forums w/ your &#8216;factual&#8217; gibberish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sage</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-32971</link>
		<author>Sage</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-32971</guid>
		<description>Yes i defend my purchases just like you defend the 360(albeit not in a fanboyish way). PS The ps3 was not overpriced for me as I use its wifi, i use its blu ray, i use its wireless controllers and i use its free online service(add those features to the 360 and you basically got a $600+ machine) so TO ME it is not overpriced at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes i defend my purchases just like you defend the 360(albeit not in a fanboyish way). PS The ps3 was not overpriced for me as I use its wifi, i use its blu ray, i use its wireless controllers and i use its free online service(add those features to the 360 and you basically got a $600+ machine) so TO ME it is not overpriced at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-32950</link>
		<author>Mike</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-32950</guid>
		<description>In Stewie Griffin voice: "What the hell r u taliking about?", all i've ever done is use facts to back up my opinions, and I work hard to counter any "facts" by people like HOBO by using other statistics. I'll admit I use my opinions often but i always try to back them up. I'll admit u where also right about Oblivion and really only bethesda know how much effort they put into the ps3 version, however u can still see that the likes of Motorstorm and HS have better graphics then anything on the 360 (yes it's an opinion, but all u have to do is compare ps3 exclusives and 360 ones to see the difference in quality). Oh and I've been in firm support of ps3 long before I got it in July even when I did have my 360. Oh and thanks for the earlier compliment in which u did say i use facts (unless u where being sarcastic).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Stewie Griffin voice: &#8220;What the hell r u taliking about?&#8221;, all i&#8217;ve ever done is use facts to back up my opinions, and I work hard to counter any &#8220;facts&#8221; by people like HOBO by using other statistics. I&#8217;ll admit I use my opinions often but i always try to back them up. I&#8217;ll admit u where also right about Oblivion and really only bethesda know how much effort they put into the ps3 version, however u can still see that the likes of Motorstorm and HS have better graphics then anything on the 360 (yes it&#8217;s an opinion, but all u have to do is compare ps3 exclusives and 360 ones to see the difference in quality). Oh and I&#8217;ve been in firm support of ps3 long before I got it in July even when I did have my 360. Oh and thanks for the earlier compliment in which u did say i use facts (unless u where being sarcastic).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Glovner</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-32898</link>
		<author>The_Glovner</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-32898</guid>
		<description>Again carefull use of the facts.

Seem to forget to mention that Oblivion had longer development time on the PS3, being that it came out over half a year later.

Can't really be arsed with all this anymore though, doesn't matter what you guys read, you spent your money on an overpriced system and you will defend your purchase until you are blue in the face so you don't feel cheated. No matter what facts are put in front you generally just ignore the ones that don't suit your stance, fuck it you can all be as deluded as you want, argue your points like a five year old child and gang wank with each other over how great your purchase was even though there is still fuck all worth playing.

Can't be arsed with the cocks on this site and can't be arsed with it on Xboxic.

Nowt but fucking kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again carefull use of the facts.</p>
<p>Seem to forget to mention that Oblivion had longer development time on the PS3, being that it came out over half a year later.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t really be arsed with all this anymore though, doesn&#8217;t matter what you guys read, you spent your money on an overpriced system and you will defend your purchase until you are blue in the face so you don&#8217;t feel cheated. No matter what facts are put in front you generally just ignore the ones that don&#8217;t suit your stance, fuck it you can all be as deluded as you want, argue your points like a five year old child and gang wank with each other over how great your purchase was even though there is still fuck all worth playing.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t be arsed with the cocks on this site and can&#8217;t be arsed with it on Xboxic.</p>
<p>Nowt but fucking kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-32793</link>
		<author>Mike</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-32793</guid>
		<description>Sorry about repeating myself at some parts but my first message was cancelled then sudenlly appeared again after my second post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about repeating myself at some parts but my first message was cancelled then sudenlly appeared again after my second post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-32792</link>
		<author>Mike</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-32792</guid>
		<description>Angry hobo, do u actually read the post's u reply to, i'll say this simply my favourite games are strategy games + the fact that strategy games are superior on pc's over consoles = this means I prefer PC's dumbass. When it comes to consoloes, well i've already made it clear why I prefer ps3 over 360 (u just have to play Oblivion on both console to see the difference, the ps3 version has better graphics which was even admitted by my 360 fanboy friend, plus the load times are much longer on the 360). Sage is right not every game has to be focused on multiplayer and some can be story focused. Oh and don't say HS is short compared to Halo 3, I completed both and H3 is even shorter and at least HS is a great game and story, whilst H3 single player was awful and boring storyline wise, multiplayer is good but not a huge improvement and is not ground-breaking (they should have taken a leaf out of Warhawk's book and focused more on multiplayer and scrapped single player). As for 50gb Blu-ray i've already explained this develpers are business first the quicker little 360 fanboys like u realise the 360 is just XBOX 2.5 (it is not next-gen as it is just a more powerful XBOX, at least the PS3 and Wii are groundbreaking) and start leaving the 360 the quicker developers will start utilizing blu-ray when PS3 hardware sales increase (which they are doing at a faster rate than that of the 360 in this stage of it's life). Oh and don't say that I don't appreciate Bioshock, I think it's a great game (one of the few good 360 games).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angry hobo, do u actually read the post&#8217;s u reply to, i&#8217;ll say this simply my favourite games are strategy games + the fact that strategy games are superior on pc&#8217;s over consoles = this means I prefer PC&#8217;s dumbass. When it comes to consoloes, well i&#8217;ve already made it clear why I prefer ps3 over 360 (u just have to play Oblivion on both console to see the difference, the ps3 version has better graphics which was even admitted by my 360 fanboy friend, plus the load times are much longer on the 360). Sage is right not every game has to be focused on multiplayer and some can be story focused. Oh and don&#8217;t say HS is short compared to Halo 3, I completed both and H3 is even shorter and at least HS is a great game and story, whilst H3 single player was awful and boring storyline wise, multiplayer is good but not a huge improvement and is not ground-breaking (they should have taken a leaf out of Warhawk&#8217;s book and focused more on multiplayer and scrapped single player). As for 50gb Blu-ray i&#8217;ve already explained this develpers are business first the quicker little 360 fanboys like u realise the 360 is just XBOX 2.5 (it is not next-gen as it is just a more powerful XBOX, at least the PS3 and Wii are groundbreaking) and start leaving the 360 the quicker developers will start utilizing blu-ray when PS3 hardware sales increase (which they are doing at a faster rate than that of the 360 in this stage of it&#8217;s life). Oh and don&#8217;t say that I don&#8217;t appreciate Bioshock, I think it&#8217;s a great game (one of the few good 360 games).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sage</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-32718</link>
		<author>Sage</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 10:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-32718</guid>
		<description>warhawk: multiplayer only(like shadowrun) because the singleplayer sucked and they canned it, no amount of disk could have changed the fact that the singleplayer sucked.HS: singleplayer only because thats what the focused on(just like Bioshock). also i reckon its a short game cause their story writers got lazy or they just didn have the time to develop more stages. MGS4/MGS4 online: well you got me there, i have no idea why they are two separate games(but i read an article where they MIGHT be put on one disk).PS i think you suck cause your not a gamer, your a microsoft fan. support gaming gents, not consoles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>warhawk: multiplayer only(like shadowrun) because the singleplayer sucked and they canned it, no amount of disk could have changed the fact that the singleplayer sucked.HS: singleplayer only because thats what the focused on(just like Bioshock). also i reckon its a short game cause their story writers got lazy or they just didn have the time to develop more stages. MGS4/MGS4 online: well you got me there, i have no idea why they are two separate games(but i read an article where they MIGHT be put on one disk).PS i think you suck cause your not a gamer, your a microsoft fan. support gaming gents, not consoles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-32666</link>
		<author>Mike</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.playstatic.com/news/813#comment-32666</guid>
		<description>Someone obviously failed there maths exams, Like I explained already, the reason developers arn't making full use of the 50gb is because it would take alot money to fill the disc (developers are businsess dumbass) and the more ps3's sold the more developers will start really using the 50gb's, only when developers for ps3 exclusives really start to compete with other ps3 exclusive developers will see the full power off the ps3 and blu-ray harnessed, the quicker little xbox fanboys like u start realising the 360 is just xbox 2.5 the quicker we can really see gaming take off.
For someone who complains about how short HS u probably shouldn't be comparing it to Halo(it's even shorter than HS), not eveygame has to have multiplayer some are story based (like bioshock). Warhawk doesn't have single player because the developers realised how vastly superior the multiplayer online was so scrapped the single player (something Halo 3 should have done). Oh and MS do get involved with making games they give developers money then interfere all the time (it's why MC is green), HS was originally running on 360 but Ninja Theory where fed up with MS sticking their nose in (problay wanted Nariko to have green hair), they approached Sony who gave them money and said do the game like u wanted to. Oh and I never said I didn't like Bioshock it's a great game especillay compred to Halo 3. One last point, the 50gb space does matter the Assassin's Credd developers are having trouble on both PS3 and XBOX 360, on the ps3 they are having trouble developing on the blu-ray (new technology so it's understandable) Sony just send a couple of programmers and problem can be solved. With 360 on the other hand they have a problem that is worse,disk space, 8.5 simply isn't enougth, it can be solved however alot of corners will have to be cut and Dowloadable content is unlikely to be much on 360.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone obviously failed there maths exams, Like I explained already, the reason developers arn&#8217;t making full use of the 50gb is because it would take alot money to fill the disc (developers are businsess dumbass) and the more ps3&#8217;s sold the more developers will start really using the 50gb&#8217;s, only when developers for ps3 exclusives really start to compete with other ps3 exclusive developers will see the full power off the ps3 and blu-ray harnessed, the quicker little xbox fanboys like u start realising the 360 is just xbox 2.5 the quicker we can really see gaming take off.<br />
For someone who complains about how short HS u probably shouldn&#8217;t be comparing it to Halo(it&#8217;s even shorter than HS), not eveygame has to have multiplayer some are story based (like bioshock). Warhawk doesn&#8217;t have single player because the developers realised how vastly superior the multiplayer online was so scrapped the single player (something Halo 3 should have done). Oh and MS do get involved with making games they give developers money then interfere all the time (it&#8217;s why MC is green), HS was originally running on 360 but Ninja Theory where fed up with MS sticking their nose in (problay wanted Nariko to have green hair), they approached Sony who gave them money and said do the game like u wanted to. Oh and I never said I didn&#8217;t like Bioshock it&#8217;s a great game especillay compred to Halo 3. One last point, the 50gb space does matter the Assassin&#8217;s Credd developers are having trouble on both PS3 and XBOX 360, on the ps3 they are having trouble developing on the blu-ray (new technology so it&#8217;s understandable) Sony just send a couple of programmers and problem can be solved. With 360 on the other hand they have a problem that is worse,disk space, 8.5 simply isn&#8217;t enougth, it can be solved however alot of corners will have to be cut and Dowloadable content is unlikely to be much on 360.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

